First Drive Review: 2010 Volkswagen Amarok

First Drive Review of the 2010 Volkswagen Amarok
By James Stanford

We're very happy that Australian correspondent James Stanford agreed to drive the new Volkswagen Amarok on our behalf in Argentina. You may remember James' first drive review of the Holden VE Ute and the Australian Sh-Ute Out that he wrote for us. He's come through once again.

If you live in the U.S. and would like a midsize pickup with workhorse capability and European refinement, you had better stop reading this.

You will only become jealous of Australians, South Americans, Europeans, South Africans and even Russians who will be able to buy the new Volkswagen Amarok. I’m sorry to say it, but the Amarok won’t be introduced in the U.S. for a very long time, if at all.

I know this ute (Australian slang for pickup) is deserving of the envy, because I’ve just driven near-production prototypes on grueling roads near Cordoba in Argentina.

Volkswagen said it developed the Amarok with the almighty Toyota Hilux firmly in its sights. We’ll have to wait for a proper fully-loaded test drive on familiar roads to make sure, but the early test suggested it could give the Toyota quite a kick in the teeth.

First Drive Review of the 2010 Volkswagen Amarok

It is set to take the lead in terms of comfort, refinement, safety and the new engines bring a new level of economy to the class too.

The Amarok might be European-designed, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s soft. Despite early predictions of a unibody chassis, like the Honda Ridgeline, it’s a conventional body-on-frame workhorse with MacPherson struts at the front and leaf springs at the rear.

It will only be available as a five-seat crew cab when it goes on sale in early 2010, but a regular cab with a longer cargo box will follow about a year later.

Our test trucks, which ran with light camouflage that included black tape and an upside down Mitsubishi badge in a token attempt to hide their identity, were fitted with some ballast in the back to aid the ride and simulate payload.

In the hands of customers, the Amarok will be able to carry 2,300 pounds (1,150kg) in the back and tow a handy 5,600 pounds (2,800kg).

First Drive Review of the 2010 Volkswagen Amarok

The Amarok looks big to us Aussies, and certainly is longer and wider than the Hilux, but then again we don’t have pick ups like the F-Series and the Ram Down Under.

Without the tape on the nose, the VW appears a bit plain. It doesn’t have the Japanese look of the Hilux or Mitsubishi Triton, which appear either futuristic or just plain weird. The Amarok isn’t all that aggressive either.

It’s a relatively simple exterior design and this flows through into the sizeable cabin. The dash and instrument cluster looks just like what you’d find in a VW passenger car. That is a step up on most of the current competitors. The design is well thought-out and gives an impression of quality and everything is easy to use. The main difference between it and a car interior is the plastics, which are hard rather than soft to the touch.

It’s spacious inside, and is 64 inches wide, which is almost 5 inches more than the Hilux and is easily the widest in the class. There’s ample headroom and more than enough legroom in the back too. You could fit four big blokes in this thing comfortably without having to rub shoulders. Drivers wanting to use the Amarok after work will be happy to know three kids would have enough space in the second row to be comfortable for long distances.

The entry-level Amaroks will be basic rigs with manual window winders, steel rims, etc but VW had us driving the upscale Highline-trimmed trucks, loaded with everything from leather seats to satellite navigation. It’s a nice option to have if you are flush with cash.

First Drive Review of the 2010 Volkswagen Amarok

More important than comfort features is what sits beneath the hood.

A gasoline direct-injection turbo four-cylinder will come in a year’s time, but for now there are two turbo diesels, both common rail and both 2.0-liters in size.

The base motor has a single variable geometry turbocharger. It is good for 122 horsepower and 250 pounds-feet of torque. Volkswagen left that one at home and only let us try the premium engine, which is essentially the same but has another turbo to help out.

The more powerful TDI engines is rated at 163 hp and a stump-pulling 295 lbs.-ft. of torque at a low 1,500 rpm. It doesn’t seem right that such a small engine can be used to pull such a big ute, but it seemed to do just fine on our test.

There is a nice surge of torque from 1,500 rpm through to 2,800 rpm, which makes the Amarok quite entertaining. It’s a smooth oil burner with linear power delivery. The two turbos work seamlessly together. Only once on the drive did it seem to lose its boost and pause before getting going again. It has ample urge with minimal weight in the back, but the real test will come when it’s towing a serious load.

The engines promise class-leading fuel economy too and, thanks to a 21-gallon tank, VW says the Amarok can go 600 miles between fills.

First Drive Review of the 2010 Volkswagen Amarok

The Amarok’s six-speed manual transmission is impressive. Six cogs are better than five, which are usually standard for this class. The box is also a pleasure to use with clear gate access and a light clutch.

The automatic? Well, there isn’t actually an automatic at the moment and it looks like we will have to wait up to three years to see one. That is a big blow for the truck in Australia, where a lot of blokes really can’t be bothered changing gears themselves.

The Amarok will be available as a rear-drive or with two different types of four-wheel drive. There’s fulltime all-wheel drive, which VW recommends for slippery tarmac as well as light gravel duties.

If you want to work the Amarok hard off the beaten track there is a part-time four-wheel drive system with a center locking Torsen differential (60/40 rear/front torque split) and low range. Both 4WD systems offer significant traction advantages on loose gravel and a short test that included a run up and down a river bank showed how capable the part time 4WD Amarok is.

All Amaroks have 11 inches of ground clearance, which makes them pretty handy for a trip into the bush.

Its electronic stability control system also lends a hand off road. When you’re driving on low traction surfaces, just hit the Off Road button and the stability system lets the truck move around a bit rather than killing the throttle at the first sign of any slip.

It also modifies the anti-skid braking technique to allow the tires to gather up a block of gravel to help it pull up faster.

There’s also the added benefit of an automatic hill descent control system to help you down the really steep gradients. At speeds under 19 mph, sensors recognize when you’re heading down a big hill and the truck automatically takes over the braking and throttle and clutch input. It can be in gear or in neutral, it doesn’t matter.

First Drive Review of the 2010 Volkswagen Amarok

The Amarok’s running gear is well suited to tough conditions like the bumpy backroads we drove in Argentina. It’s a comfortable setup, but the Amarok doesn’t wallow around too much either.

VW has done an especially good job with cabin noise suppression. It’s eerily quiet on the tarmac and still pretty serene on gravel too.

What stands out most though is the rigidity of the body. There are none of the vibrations and jiggles you usually feel come through the body of a body on frame workhorse. It feels solid.

The last-stage prototypes we drove stood up quite well. There were a couple of rattles, the engine/clutch calibration was a bit off, so they were easy to stall at low speeds, and the doors felt a bit too light and took a couple of tries to shut.

We’re still waiting to hear about the price, which will be important in the highly competitive global small truck market, but VW has claimed it wants to match the Hilux where it can.

Apart from the lack of an automatic transmission, the Amarok is a convincing package and a brilliant first attempt at a workhorse by Volkswagen.

If only they sold it in the U.S.

First Drive Review of the 2010 Volkswagen Amarok

Comments

They won't bring to us in the US because of the "chicken tax".... Google can tell you the rest of the story.

I currently own a '05 Jetta TDI w/123,000+ miles on it and have had no problems with it. It is my commuter vehicle. I also have a Toyota FJ Cruiser for pulling a trailer and to be able to combine the two vehicles into one - to have the seating capacity and the hauling capacity would be awesome. Hurry up and bring this truck to the US. I would definately get rid of both vehicles and purchase this. ; )

This truck will sell in Australia for around $60K and people here are comparing it and the $60K Hilux to the Mahindra, are you for real the Mahindra is $20k in Australia and that is $10K to much. They will need to drop the price and have an auto option to compete with the Hilux in Oz and VW doesn't have the reliability and sales outlets in Oz

Just talked to the VW dealer around the corner. Amarok is confirmed for Mexico, for late September. Can't wait!

The full size trucks sell because they are about the same price and fuel economy as the small trucks. I just bought an F-150 for less than a Ranger. Couldn't justify the move up to the much more expensive F-250 to get the diesel and no small diesels are available in US since the late 80s Izusu.

I was hopeful that the ACC would make it out of concept stage but VW opted for the SUV (Tourag).

Really... Bring us a small diesel truck. Love my Jetta TDI but would trade it for a small diesel truck, especially a VW.

Canada, no diesel light trucks here except huge low quality Fords. I want a BMW, Nissan, or Toyota diesel please.

The reason why North Americans buy F-150's/Silverados/Rams over all these European and Japanese trucks is because they can't tow anything. I'm a big Toyota and VW fan but I'm limited to the overpriced Tundra. It's the only one that can tow a good 8,000lbs, which still isn't anything to brag about. When you compare a Tundra to an F-150, the F-150's towing capacity is still a good 2,000lbs more and the price tag is a good $10K less. It's a no brainer that the F-150 is the better choice and the sales numbers obviously say the same thing. If the Japanese or Europeans wanna sell trucks in North American build a truck that can tow something - it's that easy.

The reason why North Americans buy F-150's/Silverados/Rams over all these European and Japanese trucks is because they can't tow anything. I'm a big Toyota and VW fan but I'm limited to the overpriced Tundra. It's the only one that can tow a good 8,000lbs, which still isn't anything to brag about. When you compare a Tundra to an F-150, the F-150's towing capacity is still a good 2,000lbs more and the price tag is a good $10K less. It's a no brainer that the F-150 is the better choice and the sales obviously say the same thing. If the Japanese or Europeans wanna sell trucks in North American build a truck that can tow something - it's that easy.

all it needs is a 50 cal in the back

The Amarok has the dimensions of a full size pickup with the correspondent interior and cargo space, towing and payload capacities in the range of V6 midsize/full size pickups, excellent off road capabilities, all that with mpg numbers equivalent of small car with a 4 cylinder gasoline engine.

If someone needs to tow 10,000 lbs, an high end F-150 or a heavy duty is for him. However that pickups can't get 35 mpg and the Amarok still tows 6500 lbs.

VW can sell Amarok's at the same price as the F-150, because it would be a different product with much better fuel economy.

The difference in consumption is so drastic that one can save $2-3K per year on fuel.

please bring this to USA. Would be a great seller.

ha ha 160 hp, what a joke. There's a good reason they don't sell that in North America I think. If I'm going to but a truck I might as well buy a real one instead of a Jetta with a truck frame.

The VW 2.0 liter diesel is a heck of a motor, at 300 ft lbs of torque it would be a fine performer. My little Golf TDI runs strong with the 140hp 236 ft lbs torque.... I'd trade in my Tacoma that is for sure.

As is obvious by a number of comments in this thread, there's a definite demand for compact pickups; not everybody WANTS a huge road-hogging truck!

The Ranger is gone! The S-10 is gone! The Dakota is gone! Bring them back in their original sizes or let them be imported by Holden, Ford, wherever. I need a 4-foot wide bed between the wells--after that, the smaller the better.

For all the smart people that doesn't think 160 HP is a lot. You are thinking gas motors, not diesel motors. Diesel engines compare on torque more than HP. A 2.0 L I-4 Diesel with 160 HP and 300 ft/lbs compares with my gas guzzling 17 MPG,4.7 L V-8 that only produces 300 HP and 290 ft/lbs of torque. I tried to get Dodge in 2005 to put a diesel in the Dakota, I was told " We are not interested in persuing that avenue at this time". The automakers in the US are giving us what they want to give us, Not What We Want. When we need a truck, we have to buy what is out there, not what we want. Most people don't need to tow more than 6000 Lbs. I don't think that we need to be towing 15000 Lbs with a 5000 Lb truck. When you get to those weights, you need a small semi truck.

It sounds like the real deal. I am in the market for a truck to replace my wonderful old 98 4Runner. It's been great but sucks fuel. I am fine with the standard trans. It's really a question of when will it be available in Canada? I can't wait for the auto market to pull there collective heads out of their collective asses! I hear GM is going to bring a diesel 1/2 ton to market next year? In my opinion the American auto manufacturers still continually miss the mark. Smaller and mid sized diesels are perfectly suited for the pickup market. What am I saying; I guess that is the problem. We would keep them for years and that just won't do!

I'm Canadian and hate not being able to have access to better vehicles than what is available. like the amaroc or even the toyota hilux. long live diesel motors!!!!

north American vehicle companies SUCK !!!!!

Ya that means you Ford Dodge Chev GMC and so on.....


booo hooo being a stupid canuck

@Darryn For it's first effort VW has done a 90% job. It is better Off Road and On Road than the Ranger/Mazda siblings. Downside price of the Amarok and VW's questionable reliability.
It did say recently the life of the Amarok, should be 200,000 miles. Still Toyota' and others do a lot more.
http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mellor.nsf/story2/AD02FD3EB7564B0FCA2579C3000AF74C
"Asked what competitors Volkswagen had benchmarked when developing the existing Amarok during the late 2000s, Mr Wohler said the current Toyota HiLux was chosen for its robustness and durability, while Nissan’s D40 Navara was used as an example of “convenience and value for money”.

As a result of the comparisons, Volkswagen says the Amarok has been designed for an operating life of more than 300,000km, thanks in part to the fitment of special turbo vane technology for the diesel engines and extensive gravel-road durability work."

i love this car

Volkswagen Amarok is one of the best truck in his type rather than saying best it is the award winning truck who won 3 awards in 2011.



Post a Comment

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
  • Your email will not be shown.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Home | Buy or Sell a Truck | Forums | News | Special Reports

Powered by Cars.com. By using this site, you agree to our terms of service | © 2011 Cars.com | Privacy Statement | Contact Us

Visit our partner: MovingTruck.com