2016 Midsize Pickup Challenge: Mileage Drive

Group MPG 1 II_FE

By Andy Mikonis, Cars.com

We put our five 2016 Midsize Pickup Challenge contenders through a real-world mileage test (see how we conducted the test below). Not surprisingly, when empty, all the trucks came pretty close to their EPA combined ratings, with four of the five test trucks exceeding those numbers outright. Not surprisingly, given that it has the highest EPA ratings of the group, our empty midsize winner was the 2017 Honda Ridgeline at 22.8 mpg, with the 2016 GMC Canyon close behind at 22.0, the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado at 20.8, the 2016 Toyota Tacoma at 19.5 and the 2016 Nissan Frontier at 18.1.

2016MSPU_mpg_empty_F1

Unexpectedly, the Tacoma, with its new V-6 engine and transmission, actually saw an increase of 1.3 mpg when loaded, scoring the highest mpg for payload mileage testing at 20.8. This was even more surprising to us since several judges thought it felt like it labored the most when hauling. Likewise, although several judges complained about the ride quality and highway behavior when laden, the Ridgeline didn't have any trouble actually moving the goods and pulled off a respectable second-place performance at 20.0 mpg with almost 1,400 pounds aboard. It's worth noting that the pickup with the oldest engine and lowest horsepower, the Frontier, showed the smallest decrease in fuel economy when comparing empty and loaded loops, recording the lowest mileage in both categories, with the smallest maximum calculated payload of the group.

Frontier Motion 1 II

The Canyon and Ridgeline had the highest mileage decreases when comparing empty and loaded mileage, with 3.4 and 2.8 mpg respectively. We should also note our afternoon drive loop did have a prevailing southwest wind averaging between 13 and 15 mph with a few occasional gusts. This may have affected some vehicles more than others. Additionally, leg two in the afternoon saw 20 minutes of stop-and-go traffic due to temporary lane restrictions as traffic built up. Also, leg five in the afternoon saw higher cruising speeds, which may have been more of a disadvantage to the loaded trucks given the increased wind speeds.

2016MSPU_mpg_loaded_F1

A comparison of the Colorado and the Canyon, with identical drivetrains and EPA estimates, suggests factors in the afternoon may have dragged down mileage across the board. The Canyon's empty morning run bettered the Colorado's empty afternoon run by a not-insignificant 1.2 mpg, around a 6 percent improvement (the long-wheelbase Colorado was just 100 pounds heavier). Interestingly, the Colorado's loaded loop beat the Canyon loaded by a slight margin. Looking back, these conditions likely accentuated the Tacoma's curious numbers as well, where its loaded mpg number (20.8) was better than its empty loop (19.5). As the EPA estimate footnote states, "... actual results will vary for many reasons."

Fuel Fillup PO II

How We Conducted the Testing

Our mileage drive consisted of a 165-mile loop that we drove twice around Ann Arbor, Mich. All our trucks had V-6 engines ranging from 3.5 to 4.0 liters, automatic transmissions and four- or all-wheel drive systems.

The drive loop contained several types of on-road driving situations from congested city traffic, high-speed interstate highway, country roads, unpaved sections of road and even some stop-sign-to-stop-sign neighborhood driving.

Loading the Bed 1 II

During our first loop, two of our pickups ran empty while the other pickups were loaded (with bags of rock salt) to 90 percent of their calculated maximum payload after we weighed each pickup and subtracted that amount from its gross vehicle weight rating. Our route was divided into five legs so that each judge drove each truck, and so that weight and driving style differences were minimized. We had the same person fuel each pickup at the same pump at the same station at the beginning and end of each loop to reduce as many variables as possible.

During our loops, we drove normally, obeying all posted speed limits, and did not let the trucks idle at stops. All the trucks were set to two-wheel drive except the Ridgeline (which does not have that option), and we had all windows up with the air conditioning on auto and a consistent temperature setting for each truck.

Ridgeline Motion 1 II

Cars.com photos by Angela Conners

Overview | Acceleration and Braking | Off-Road Performance | Mileage | What the Judges Said | Results

Comments

So once again, you decided that each truck should be tested differently, when it came to payload. As a customer/owner, you ask a particular task of your truck, not a task that's some percentage of some other number. It would make way more sense tasking all trucks in the test with the lowest capacity in the group. Why should an vehicle be penalized in a COMPARISON for having more capability/reserve capacity.
That said, I wonder if the trans in the Toyota adapted shift patterns by the end of the (gentle) unloaded drive cycle, and then gave you more frugal performance thereafter. Or perhaps a problem with the fuel it had at the start.
23mpg in mixed driving is impressive, as are the numbers for the Gm trucks.

I agree Mr knowitall, I would have liked to see them put the same weight in each truck. Plus, not just rotate drivers but to add weight to the lighter drivers so no matter what truck they are in the weight is the same. The light guy in start and stop driving will get different mileage then a heavy guy, same wiht highway...Lots of apples and oranges here.

I will probably be getting a Canyon, and wonder what gas mileage it would gets if left in AWD most of the time?

Around here all roads are black top, if it rains/mist it is super slick....I can broad slid my 2011 Canyon around corners with out trying, plus spin the tires just leaving a stop sign when pavement is wet...

wow sacrifice the noticeable to huge gains in power, payload, towing, interior space of a half ton (even V6) full size for almost no savings in money and all you get is 1 to 3 more MPG. Im done wrangling over 2 MPG. I want my truck capable and my car to be efficient.

wow sacrifice the noticeable to huge gains in power, payload, towing, interior space of a half ton (even V6) full size for almost no savings in money and all you get is 1 to 3 more MPG. Im done wrangling over 2 MPG. I want my truck capable and my car to be efficient.


Posted by: Clint | Aug 25, 2016 6:41:13 AM
Unless you need a smaller vehicle there is no real justification for a midsized over a 1500. Prices are similar. FE is really close. A lot of 1500 will tow more (except a fiat 1500). But if you need a smaller truck, these will work well.

Just remember, the Honda NEEDS to get better mileage, because it is the only one with a timing belt- and that costs $$ at the dealership.

Top midsize truck bar none 4x4 Colorado diesel
the tool to off road all day long and pass the pumps on the way home.
Unless your a rock crawler the GM has you covered.



Post a Comment

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
  • Your email will not be shown.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Home | Buy or Sell a Truck | News | Special Reports

Powered by Cars.com. By using this site, you agree to our terms of service | © 2017 Cars.com | Privacy Statement | Contact Us